Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Percy Rustomji Basta v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1971 SC 1087); Poolpandi and others v. Superintendent of Central Excise and others

Kavitha G.Pillai vs The Joint Director on 5 August, 2015 Author: Dama Seshadri Naidu

Kavitha G.Pillai vs The Joint Director on 30 June, 2015 Author: Dama Seshadri Naidu

Kavitha G.Pillai vs The Joint Director on 5 August, 2015 Author: Dama Seshadri Naidu

possibility of such person being prosecuted in future. 7. In Poolpandi v. Superintendent, Central Excise [(1992) 3 SCC 259] the Honourable Supreme Court had occasion

context of the enquiry envisaged in the Customs Act , [vide Poolpandi v. Superintendent, Central Excise - AIR 1992 SC 1795] pointing out that the former ... legal practitioner's presence during the oral examination as different from-Poolpandi's case (cited supra) 8. We, therefore, conclude that appellant cannot

further delayed, not regarding the petitioners but other persons also. 7. In Poolpandi and Others Vs. Superintendent, Central Excise and Others

others (AIR 1987 OP(KAT)85/2018 7 SC 2195) and Poolpandi and others v. Superintendent, Central Excise and others