Percy Rustomji Basta v. State of Maharashtra (AIR
1971 SC 1087); Poolpandi and others v. Superintendent of
Central Excise and others
Kavitha G.Pillai vs The Joint Director on 5 August, 2015
Author: Dama Seshadri Naidu
Kavitha G.Pillai vs The Joint Director on 30 June, 2015
Author: Dama Seshadri Naidu
Kavitha G.Pillai vs The Joint Director on 5 August, 2015
Author: Dama Seshadri Naidu
possibility of such person being
prosecuted in future.
7. In Poolpandi v. Superintendent, Central
Excise [(1992) 3 SCC 259] the Honourable Supreme
Court had occasion
context of the enquiry envisaged in the Customs Act , [vide Poolpandi v. Superintendent, Central Excise - AIR 1992 SC 1795] pointing out that the former ... legal practitioner's presence during the oral examination as different from-Poolpandi's case (cited supra)
8. We, therefore, conclude that appellant cannot
further delayed, not regarding the
petitioners but other persons also.
7. In Poolpandi and Others Vs. Superintendent,
Central Excise and Others
others (AIR 1987
OP(KAT)85/2018 7
SC 2195) and Poolpandi and others v. Superintendent, Central
Excise and others