respondent
authorities. The ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in
Poolpandi & Others Vs. Superintendent Central Excise
&Others ... argued that while the judgment
of the Supreme Court in Poolpandi , supra, has been rendered
by a three-Judge-bench in 1992, but the judgment
respondent
authorities. The ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in
Poolpandi & Others Vs. Superintendent Central Excise
&Others ... argued that while the judgment
of the Supreme Court in Poolpandi , supra, has been rendered
by a three-Judge-bench in 1992, but the judgment
respondent
authorities. The ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in
Poolpandi & Others Vs. Superintendent Central Excise
&Others ... argued that while the judgment
of the Supreme Court in Poolpandi , supra, has been rendered
by a three-Judge-bench in 1992, but the judgment
respondent
authorities. The ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in
Poolpandi & Others Vs. Superintendent Central Excise
&Others ... argued that while the judgment
of the Supreme Court in Poolpandi , supra, has been rendered
by a three-Judge-bench in 1992, but the judgment
Nandini Satpathy
was not followed by the Court in later decisions. In Poolpandi & Ors
v. Superintendent, Central Excise ... view taken in the
minority judgment in the case the decision in Poolpandi observed in
paragraph 10 as follows:
"10.....We do not share
Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh vs Directorate Of Enforcement And Anr on 29 October, 2021
Author: Nitin
implication. But in view of the recent decision of the Supreme Court (Poolpandi and Ors v. Suptdt. Central Excise and Ors.), the aforesaid two decisions ... question was decided by the Supreme Court. In view of the decision ( Poolpandi and Ors. v. Superintendent, Central Excise and Ors. ), as already referred
lorry
bearing registration No.TCT-7484 along with Vellaichamy, Chelladurai and
Poolpandi, the lorry was driven by the accused in a rash and negligent manner ... capsized the lorry, as a result of it
P.W.1, Chelladurai, Poolpandi and Vellaichamy were buried in the sand
Kumar Agarwal Vs. DGGI, and Sudhir Gulati Vs.
Union of India3 and Poolpandi Vs. Superintendent, Central Excise4 .
40. Respondents 6 to 9 filed counter affidavits ... same by
placing reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in Poolpandi (4
supra) and the decisions of the Delhi High Court
Sanjay Mukeshbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 13 July, 2022
Author: Sonia Gokani
Bench
