Poolpandi vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 August, 2021
Bench: V.Bharathidasan , J.Nisha Banu
H.C.P.(MD) No.1189 of 2020
BEFORE ... JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
H.C.P.(MD) No.1189 of 2020
Poolpandi ... Petitioner/ Detenu
vs.
1.State of Tamil Nadu
represented by the Additional
Poolpandi @ Pandi vs The District Collector Cum Inspector Of ... on 1 February, 2021
Author: M.M.Sundresh
Bench: M.M.Sundresh , S.Ananthi ... JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
W.P.(MD)No.19033 of 2020
P.Poolpandi @ Pandi : Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayat,
Thoothukudi District
Poolpandi vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 22 April, 2021
Author: N.Anand Venkatesh
Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh
W.P.(MD)No.4656 ... Poolpandi v. The Revenue Divisional Officer
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH Court
DATED: 22.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh vs Directorate Of Enforcement And Anr on 29 October, 2021
Author: Nitin
that the law laid down by the
Supreme Court in case of Poolpandi and
others v. Superintendent, Central
Excise and others reported ... Constitution is
affected as held by the Supreme Court
in case of Poolpandi (supra). This
Court, however, is quite conscious of
the fact that pronouncement
that the law laid down by the
Supreme Court in case of Poolpandi and
others v. Superintendent, Central
Excise and others reported ... Constitution is
affected as held by the Supreme Court
in case of Poolpandi (supra). This
Court, however, is quite conscious of
the fact that pronouncement
respondent and setting the detenue Muthupandi, aged about
28 years, Son of Poolpandi at liberty now detained in the Central Prison,
Palayamkottai.
For Petitioner ... been filed by the mother of the detenu,
namely, Muthupandi, son of Poolpandi, Male aged about 28 years, who has been
branded as “Goonda
Suborno Bose v. Enforcement Directorate and another [(2020) (2)
MLJ 646]; and Poolpandi and others v. Superintendent, Central Excise
and others ... during investigation, the respondents denied the same, relying on
the decision in Poolpandi (supra), in which, the supreme court held as
follows
Customs Act .
89. In a recent decision, this Court in Poolpandi v. Superintendent,
Central Excise [(1992) 3 SCC 259 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 620] has
reiterated
possibility of such person being
prosecuted in future.
7. In Poolpandi v. Superintendent, Central
Excise [(1992) 3 SCC 259] the Honourable Supreme
Court had occasion
