Search Results Page

Search Results

71 - 80 of 99036 (7.23 seconds)

Eldho vs Manual on 31 July, 2014

Muvattupuzha against the licensor seeking a decree of prohibitory injunction for protecting the possession of the licensee. 4. The licensor, who is the original respondent ... contracting out. Even if that is accepted, such right to protect possession cannot be extended for any period beyond such three months from the date
Kerala High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - B K Pasha - Full Document

Chikkabasavaiah vs Smt Bhagyalakshmi on 13 June, 2012

person who is in unauthorized possession cannot be granted a decree for possession to protect the unlawful possession of the suit property by the plaintiff ... concerned the person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession and in order to protect such possession he may even use reasonable force
Karnataka High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

V. Srinivas vs ) Smt.Shakuntalamma on 4 October, 2021

right to protect his possession by way of adverse possession. It is further stated that the protection of possession flowing from contract is the essence ... under a sale agreement obtained possession over the property in part performance of contract and the said possession is protected even if the period
Bangalore District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kuldeep Singh Hooda vs Shri Narender Mehlawat on 27 April, 2018

lawful   possession.   Except   the   oral   tenancy,   no   other   evidence   was   brought   on   record.   Entries   in   the   revenue   records   cannot   be   establish   lawful   possession, when, admittedly ... possession cannot be said to be lawful possession. In other words,   his possession is of a trespasser, which is not protected
Delhi District Court Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

40 030 vs Nusli Neville Wadia on 29 April, 2014

submitted that the lessee is trying to protect recovery of possession by this originating summons from this court which has no jurisdiction. It is submitted ... appellants contended that these are suits for injunction simpliciter for protecting their possession from the illegal threatened acts of respondents-defendants. Relying on a series
Bombay High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document
Previous   4 5 6 7 8   9 10 11 12 13 Next