others to contend that the Objector has a right to protect his
possession in execution of the decree as per the facts on record.
Learned ... only the judicial
trend which has declined to interfere to protect unlawful possession
or possession of ranked trespasser etc. but, on the other hand,
judicial
others to contend that the Objector has a right to protect his
possession in execution of the decree as per the facts on record.
Learned ... only the judicial
trend which has declined to interfere to protect unlawful possession
or possession of ranked trespasser etc. but, on the other hand,
judicial
said
proceedings and that the plaintiff is entitled to protect his possession, which
was delivered to him in terms of the agreement to sell ... petitioner is not entitled
to seek any restraint order to protect his possession.
The fact that the case is fixed for the evidence
only the
judicial trend which has declined to interfere to protect
unlawful possession or possession of ranked trespasser
etc. but, on the other hand, judicial
regarding title of the property
and that the plaintiffs have proved their possession over the suit
property and are entitled to the protection.
Civil Revision ... plaintiffs are in established possession and,
therefore, are entitled to protect their possession. Relying upon The
Municipal Committee, Sirsa v. Arjan Dass
restrained
from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff-respondent.
Earlier, the defendant-petitioner filed a suit for
possession. Said suit was dismissed ... possession filed by the petitioner to return a finding that the plaintiff-
respondent is in possession and is entitled to protect his possession.
Learned counsel
defendant, its agents, attorneys, servants etc., from interfering into the peaceful
possession of the plaintiff from Booth No. 1 situated within Development Scheme ... have dismissed the suit
holding that after resumption, the plaintiff cannot protect his possession. It may be
noticed that there is no challenge
plaintiff has, prima-facie, succeeded in
establishing his possession and the same needs to be protected. After
returning such finding, the Court passed an order ... parties to maintain status quo regarding possession, use,
construction and ownership of the property.
Challenge by the present petitioner is to the part
opportunity to purge themselves of the
contempt by delivering vacant physical possession to the
complainants on or before October 30, 1990. If that ... either of them might have inducted into the premises and
deliver vacant possession of the first floor accommodation in
Property No. 125 A, Purva Suthi
alone and that the
house was lying vacant after his death, the possession of which could be
taken by the decree holder is not tenable ... necessity of respondent Nos.1 to 3 to
prosecute the appeal to protect the interest of Shagan Lal. The address
mentioned in the application
