respondent
vehemently contended that he is in possession of the suit
land and therefore his possession be protected till the time
he is not evicted ... concerned the person in peaceful possession is
rt
entitled to retain his possession and in order to
protect such possession he may even use
reasonable
only be used as a shield of
defence to protect the possession, but cannot be used as a sword,
meaning thereby, the plaintiff cannot claim ... defence in the written statement only for a
limited purpose to protect the possession after expiry of the statutory
period of limitation.
21. Therefore, this
agreement to sell Ex.PW1/A and the possession was also protected
under Section 53-A of the Act.
16. In addition ... null and void. To hold the contrary will mean to protect illegal
possession on the basis of a void transaction and to nullify the
provisions
vehemently contended that they are in possession of the suit land and
their possession be protected till the time they are not evicted except ... concerned the
person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession
and in order to protect such possession he may even use
.
reasonable force
vehemently contended that as he is in possession of the suit land,
his possession be protected till the time he is not evicted, except ... concerned
the person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his
possession and in order to protect such possession he
may even use reasonable force
concerned the
person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession
and in order to protect such possession he may even use
reasonable force ... proof of better title, possession or prior peaceful settled
possession is itself evidence of title. Law presumes the possession to
go with the title unless
concerned the
person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession and
in order to protect such possession he may even use reasonable
force ... proof of better title,
possession or prior peaceful settled possession is itself evidence of
title. Law presumes the possession to go with the title unless
concerned the
person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession and
in order to protect such possession he may even use reasonable
force ... proof of better title,
possession or prior peaceful settled possession is itself evidence of
title. Law presumes the possession to go with the title unless
concerned the
person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession and
in order to protect such possession he may even use reasonable
force ... proof of better title,
possession or prior peaceful settled possession is itself evidence of
title. Law presumes the possession to go with the title unless
concerned the person in peaceful possession is entitled
to retain his possession and in order to protect such
possession he may even use reasonable force ... person wanting to acquire
title by adverse possession, his adverse possession
cannot commence until he obtains actual possession
with the required animus
