therefore they have not refused to accept
the same and if there is any report of refusal given by the postman then same is
false ... that they have not
refused to accept the same and if there is any report of refusal given by the
postman on registered envelop then
Counsel but the
defendant intentionally and deliberately in collusion with the postman
refused to receive the said notice, hence the same was returned
undelievered with
postman and same has not been followed. There
was no occasion for the postman to intimate the neighbours about the
refusal of summons ... family member never refused to accept the
summons or that the plaintiff obtained the report of refusal in
collusion with the postman, but the defendant
mandir as the plaintiff is in the habit of refusing the postman
whenever he comes to them. The plaintiff is in the habit of
refusing
Registered AD envelope containing the
legal notice on which remarks of postman "refused" are clearly
observed. Accordingly, the plaintiff has established nexus between
registered AD post and, therefore, the endorsement of the
Postman 'REFUSED' by the defendant has to be treated correct and
the defendant ... sent on
15.1.2003 and the refusal endorsement by the Postman on the legal
notice is dated 25.1.2003 and, therefore, in my considered view the
plaintiff
Defendant and requested
him for returning of his money, but, Defendant refused to
pay any single penny to Plaintiff and also threatened him
that ... through Speed Post but, Defendant in collusion
and conspiracy with concerned postman refused the
service of the said notice. The notice was sent
legal notice of all the defendants returned with report of postman refused.
The returned envelop alongwith postman endorsement
Vihar,
Solanki Market, New Delhi59. The endorsement of the Postman is
"refused". It is dated 11.02.05. That letter
therefore, stated that in collusion with the Postman,
the respondent has obtained the refusal report with
regard to the registered letter in which ... notice at the above
address and in collusion with the Postman
manipulated the refusal report and has prevented the
receiving of the alleged notice sent