proof of an attempt made by the postman to serve the registered notice on the addressee and refusal of the same by the addressee ... have served at all, simply because the postman who had made the en-dorsement of refusal had not been produced. The decision of the High
Ichalakaranji for treatment; that she had not refused to receive the notice ; that the postman had never brought the registered cover to her arid ... petitioner on 11-10-1985. Therefore the postman returned it with the shara that "the addressee refused to receive hence returned to the sender
cause title.
Hence, the question of the postman reporting
that there was a refusal of service would not
arise.
11. Per contra, Sri.Gode Nagaraj ... effected and the same was refused which has been
endorsed by the postman in the returned RPAD
cover, I am of the considered opinion that
postman about 11 months ago. The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that the respondent should have examined the postman who tendered the envelope ... gave evidence that he had not refused the service of summons and that the endorsement of refusal on the postal envelope was not true
served upon her, is a
total falsity as she has refused the notice sent through RPAD,
has, in support of this contention in the statement ... evidence to show that the remarks
"refused" has been written by the Postman in Ex.P.20.
Ex.P.20 does not bear
refused to receive them. Consequently, he
has failed to send any reply. Though during his cross-
examination, accused has denied that he has refused ... sent. The accused
has not chosen to examine the postman to prove that he
never refused to receive the legal notice and the
endorsement thereon
refused to receive them. Consequently, he
has failed to send any reply. Though during his cross-
examination, accused has denied that he has refused ... sent. The accused
has not chosen to examine the postman to prove that he
never refused to receive the legal notice and the
endorsement thereon
which were sent and returned with
postal shara as refused by the accused the trial court
came to conclusion that, complaint is barred by time ... round seal is also there as 03-08-
2009. The postman shara as refused is also dated:
04-08-2009. Therefore, simply because
station' when the visit was made by the postman and
thereafter an application was filed under Order V Rule ... case of refusal, but he was not present at the time
when the postman went to make service
very clear that postman visited on
several occasions and ultimately he has refused the receipt
of notice and now cannot contend that no notice ... very clear
that postman went to the house of the petitioner on
several occasion and ultimately he has refused to receive
the notice and there
