given a requisition letter
under Ex.P-23 to carry out potency test on the Accused. Accordingly, potency
test was conducted. P.W-13 also
given a requisition letter under Ex.P-23 to carry out potency test on the
Accused. Accordingly, potency test was conducted. P.W-13 also
subjected to
sexual intercourse. Similarly, the Accused was subjected to potency test and
therefore PW12 examined the Doctor who issued potency certificate
victim as
16 to 18. Based on the Radiology Test Report under Ex.P-8, in his cross
examination, he had admitted that ... from the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate to conduct the
potency test on the Accused and issued Potency Certificate under Ex.P-13.
https
already pending before the bench of this
Court, is regarding the potency test in sexual offences case and in that case, the
learned Additional Public
would also invited the attention of this
Court to the potency test by the Investigation Officer through the Doctor,
S.Valliappan, Department of Forensic Medicine
would also invited the attention of this
Court to the potency test by the Investigation Officer through the Doctor,
S.Valliappan, Department of Forensic Medicine
before whom the Appellant was produced and who had
performed the potency test on him. P.W-11 is the Special Sub Inspector of
Police
with the evidence of the Dr.Mahalakshmi/P.W.11 and
the test report of the prosecutrix issued by P.W-11 under ... prosecution through P.W-13-
Dr.Selvaraj and issuance of potency certificate under Ex.P4. On perusal of the
evidence of the witnesses
Doctor who had examined the Accused and issued potency
certificate under Ex.P-6 was also relied by the learned Judge. The argument ... life that was deprecated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and not test of
the Doctors. Therefore, the reliance placed by the learned Counsel