took
accused to Safdarjung Hospital for conduct of his potency test. Dr.Mohit
Gupta PW-21, conducted the potency test of the accused and concluded
pullandas with FSL, Rohini. PW-
5 Dr. Sandeep Kumar proved the potency test of respondent Brij
Mohan ... declared hostile. PW-13, Dr. Rajeev Sood proved the potency test
Ex.PW5/A and investigation for potency test
accused was sent to AIIMS Hospital for
his medical examination and potency test and after his
examination, his MLCs Ex.PX (colly) and potency test ... accused admitted his MLCs as Ex.PX (colly)
and potency test report as Ex.PY and in view of the same,
prosecution witnesses namely
prepared his MLC on 09.07.2017; he further
conducted the appellant‟s potency test on 10.07.2017, wherein he opined
that there was nothing to suggest that ... witness‟ directions, SI
Dinesh also got the potency test of the appellant conducted. On 20.07.2017,
the exhibits were sent to FSL Rohini through Ct. Munshi
accused namely Anil
Kumar.‖
***
―During investigation, SI Sangeeta got conducted the potency
test of accused Divyansh Bajpai from BSA Hospital vide
clinical examination NO.2012023 ... further opinion may be give after receipt of
abovementioned investigation". Potency test report of accused
is annexed to the case file.‖
***
―Thereafter SI Sangeeta
Azia Manzoor Bhat/PW-6
conducted the appellant‟s potency test and prepared an MLC (Ex. PW-6/A).
Dr. Rakesh Solanki/PW-7 identified ... conducted (MLC is
Ex. PW-3/A) and also got the potency test of the appellant done (MLC is
Ex. PW-6/A). She stated
arrested the petitioner and
took him to LBS Hospital where his potency test was conducted. His
medical examination was conducted vide
Vijeta and Mahendra had
confessed to their crime. After conducting the potency test of
Mahendra, at the AIIMS, vide MLC No 10795/2013
took the accused to AIIMs for his medical
examination and potency test along with Ct.
Surajveer Singh/PW6. The accused was
medically examined ... Section 294 Cr.P.C) was taken. The report of the
Potency Test/Ex.PW7/Y was also collected. The
samples collected
potency test of the said witnesses, and the appellant (the reports
whereof were exhibited as Ex. PW-9/A to PW-9/D), conducted