under Public Premises (Eviction of
Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 . (for short PPE Act). The
petitioner states that it was a Government Company
incorporated under ... Notice dated 3rd November 1995 under section
4 of the PPE Act. In the said Notice the Estate Officer rightly
did not mention any ground
Public Premises (Eviction of
Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (for short PPE Act), recovery of
arrears of rent with interest under Section ... PPE Act, and,
recovery of damages with interest under Section 7(2)(2A) of PPE Act.
The Appellate Authority partly allowed the appeal
Public Premises (Eviction of
Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (for short PPE Act), recovery of
arrears of rent with interest under Section ... PPE Act, and,
recovery of damages with interest under Section 7(2)(2A) of PPE Act.
The Appellate Authority partly allowed the appeal
Public Premises (Eviction of
Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (for short PPE Act), recovery of
arrears of rent with interest under Section ... PPE Act, and,
recovery of damages with interest under Section 7(2)(2A) of PPE Act.
The Appellate Authority partly allowed the appeal
Public Premises (Eviction of
Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (for short PPE Act), recovery of
arrears of rent with interest under Section ... PPE Act, and,
recovery of damages with interest under Section 7(2)(2A) of PPE Act.
The Appellate Authority partly allowed the appeal
Unauthorised
Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "the PPE Act").
The second respondent is the Estate Officer, whereas, respondent ... section 2 of section 4 of
the PPE Act. The grounds on which the notices have been issued
read as under:-
"GROUNDS
Land admeasuring
issued by Air India Limited which makes a
reference to the PPE Act, in event the premises are not vacated. He has
further taken this ... Division Bench of this Court, which makes specific
reference to the PPE Act. He submits that as AIAHCL is the owner of the
structures
issued by Air India Limited which makes a
reference to the PPE Act, in event the premises are not vacated. He has
further taken this ... Division Bench of this Court, which makes specific
reference to the PPE Act. He submits that as AIAHCL is the owner of the
structures
issued by Air India Limited which makes a
reference to the PPE Act, in event the premises are not vacated. He has
further taken this ... Division Bench of this Court, which makes specific
reference to the PPE Act. He submits that as AIAHCL is the owner of the
structures
issued by Air India Limited which makes a
reference to the PPE Act, in event the premises are not vacated. He has
further taken this ... Division Bench of this Court, which makes specific
reference to the PPE Act. He submits that as AIAHCL is the owner of the
structures
