Direct the concerned Police Station to register an FIR against Mr.
Prashant Bhushan, the Petitioner Association (i.e. Common Cause) and Mr.
Kamal Kant Jaswal ... When the case was taken up on 8th May, 2013 Mr. Prashant Bhushan
learned counsel for Common Cause made his submissions. Keeping the
submissions
Prashant Bhushan vs Union Of India & Anr on 7 January, 2016
Author: Jayant Nath
Bench: Chief Justice , Jayant Nath
* IN THE HIGH COURT ... Date of Decision: 7th January, 2016
+ W.P.(C) 1524/2015
PRASHANT BHUSHAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Sh. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with
Sh.Pranav Sachdeva
Shri Prashant Bhushan vs Deputy Commissioner Police (Dcp), ... on 9 March, 2009
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2009/0023 dated ... Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19
Appellant: Shri Prashant Bhushan
Respondent: Deputy Commissioner Police (DCP), Crime & Railways
FACTS
By an application
Prashant Bhushan vs Incorrect Or That The on 31 August, 2020
Author: Arun Mishra
Bench: Krishna Murari , B.R. Gavai , Arun Mishra
REPORTABLE ... MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) NO.1 OF 2020
IN RE:
PRASHANT BHUSHAN AND ANR.
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General
Prashant Bhushan vs Court That A Notice Was Issued To The on 14 August, 2020
Author: Arun Mishra
Bench: Krishna Murari , B.R. Gavai , Arun ... MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) NO.1 OF 2020
IN RE:
PRASHANT BHUSHAN & ANR. …. ALLEGED CONTEMNOR(S)
JUDGMENT
1. A petition came to be filed
Direct the concerned Police Station to register an FIR
against Mr. Prashant Bhushan, the Petitioner Association
(i.e. Common Cause) and Mr. Kamal Kant Jaswal ... case was taken up on 8 th May, 2013 Mr.
Prashant Bhushan learned counsel for Common Cause
made his submissions. Keeping the submissions in mind
which Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, petitioner-in-person and Mr. Prashant
Bhushan agreed and, accordingly, the Court issued notice to the States of
Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh ... rejoinder by Mr. Manohar Lal
Sharma, petitioner-in-person and Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for
Common Cause were also concluded on that
flat buyers in the written submissions tendered during the hearing. Mr
Prashant Bhushan, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants has formulated
his submissions under ... been recovered from the flat buyers.
The above submissions of Mr Prashant Bhushan have been reiterated in the
submissions urged before the Court
application being Crl. M. 334 of 1992 was filed by Shri Prashant Bhushan, Advocate as a public interest litigant expressing his grievance that no proper ... relevant points mentioned in the written argument filed by Shri Prashant Bhushan were fully argued by the counsel for the CBI and, therefore, the allegations
Surendranath, learned senior counsel and Mr Kuldip Rai and
Mr Prashant Bhushan on behalf of the petitioners and the intervenors. Mr Mukul
Rohtagi
