JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, AG
Mr. Ranjit ... filed an affidavit
pursuant to our order dated 13.01.2016. Mr. Prashant Bhushan,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Government of
India ought
would have been significantly different for
3G and BWA spectrum.”
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, at the time of arguments, pointed out the aforesaid
procedural and other
JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv.
Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG,
MS. Binu ... Court made the following
O R D E R
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner
has today filed a detailed note based
directions of the Hon’ble Court. xxxxxx”
8. Shri Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4
opposed the prayers of the applicant alleging
decided not to interfere in the matter.
16. We heard Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned Advocate appearing in support
of the petition and Mr. Ranjit Kumar
counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Mr. Prashant Bhusan, learned counsel has drawn our attention
to a Parliamentary Committee Report ... what
process are the said standards being enforced.
Mr.Prashant Bhushan also argued that there is no agency
currently monitoring the TERM cells which
Thomas, Adv.
Mr. Ritwick Dutta, Adv.
Ms. Vshruti Vijay, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
2
Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Mukul Rohtagi
Vaibhav Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Suraj Prakash Singh, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
Mr. Sudhansu ... Reason: MS. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
Mr. Akhilesh Kalra, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh Grewal
file their responses and status reports.
On 04.09.2014, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Counsel for the Petitioners in Writ
Petition No.572 of 2003, placed the “Scheme
Chowdhary, Adv.
Mr. Anip Sachthey ,Adv.
9
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following