written
complaint to the Patna Regional Development Authority ( in short
"PRDA") against him for sub-leasing one of the shops by Bihar
Emporium ... basis thereof the Estate Officer, PRDA vide
his letter No.973 directed the Managing Director of Bihar State
Small Scale Industries Ltd. to file
services rendered in Patna
-2-
Regional Development Authority (for short „PRDA‟)
preferred the writ petition for quashment of the same. It was
contended before ... learned Single Judge that he was
appointed in PRDA on 26.11.2990 and thereafter he was
appointed in Road Construction Department of the State
Government with
order dated 25.04.2005, the
respondent no. 2, i.e., the Vice Chairman, PRDA had passed
certain order on 13.08.2003 in Vigilance Case ... application hinges on the
compliance of the orders of the Vice Chairman, PRDA, and as
such, in view of the stay granted by the Appellate
refused to
interfere with the orders passed by the appellate Tribunal,
PRDA on 03.04.2006 passed in Appeal No. 54 of 2005 and
of the Vice ... according
to the appellant, only after obtaining the required sanction
from the PRDA, but, on a complaint by one of the residents
in the locality
would
show that on the date of the merger of the 'PRDA' the
employees of the Corporation were getting pension but this
benefit ... allowed to the employees of the erstwhile
'PRDA' who were absorbed in the Corporation as a consequence
of the merger
would
show that on the date of the merger of the 'PRDA' the
employees of the Corporation were getting pension but this
benefit ... allowed to the employees of the erstwhile
'PRDA' who were absorbed in the Corporation as a consequence
of the merger
sanction from any authority but under the supervision of
the officer of PRDA. It is also observed by the learned Single Judge
that the landlord ... gave a false undertaking to the PRDA that he would
remove the old structure but however he did not take any steps for
removal
petitioner that the erstwhile Patna
Regional Development Authority (in short 'PRDA') was
dissolved in the year 2007 and all the employees ... PRDA'
became employees of the Corporation. It is thus, the contention
of the petitioner that he has to be treated at par with
regarding the fixation of
fee of the petitioners, who were working for PRDA in different courts
between 1989 to 1993.
Learned counsel, appearing for petitioners ... Justice Singh elevated to the
bench, the petitioner No. 1 worked for PRDA independently. The
petitioner No. 1 was designated senior advocate
area of plot was declared to be 5.221 Katha by PRDA,
which succeeded Patna Improvement Trust.
It is next submitted that Zafar Imam ... Imam got the
land mutated in his name on 07.05.1987 by the PRDA, but
the lease deed was not executed in his favour, despite
