9544 of 1993 dt.26-07-2013
2/4
the respondent PRDA to resolve the issue. However,
they refused to accept the and, therefore ... that the erstwhile
Patna Regional Development Authority (hereinafter
referred to as "PRDA" for short) had taken a serious
view of the fact that
Secretary,
Maurya Lok Complex, Patna.
2.The Vice Chairman, PRDA, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbunglow Road,
Patna.
3.The Secretary, PRDA, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbunglow Road ... Patna.
4.The Assistant Engineer, PRDA, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbunglow
Road, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Pratap Singh
Dhirendra Kumar
S/o Sh. Rameshwar Prasad Sinha
R/o Beur Prda Flat,
Qtrs. No. 1 P.O. Anishabad,
Patna-2, Bihar
from the Municipal authority or the then Patna
Regional Development Authority, Patna (PRDA) on basis of
development agreement executed by the land owner. In case
stated to have been passed by the
erstwhile Patna Regional Development Authority (PRDA) for the
constructions in question and also the original file along with
stated to have been passed by the
erstwhile Patna Regional Development Authority (PRDA) for the
constructions in question and also the original file along with
stated to have been passed by the
erstwhile Patna Regional Development Authority (PRDA) for the
constructions in question and also the original file along with
stated to have been passed by the
erstwhile Patna Regional Development Authority (PRDA) for the
constructions in question and also the original file along with
stated to have been passed by the
erstwhile Patna Regional Development Authority (PRDA) for the
constructions in question and also the original file along with
stated to have been passed by the
erstwhile Patna Regional Development Authority (PRDA) for the
constructions in question and also the original file along with
