only plea regarding pre-emption is that the plaintiffs are
28
adjacent owners to the schedule properties having- their pre
emptive right over the schedule ... appendages such as right of
way or a right to discharge water or owners of adjoining
immovable property. The right of pre-emption
enabling the non-defaulting parties to claim their pre-emptive right rights
and the Government had an obligation to consider the same if satisfied ... ACIL on Article 31 of the PSC to claim an
exclusive/pre-emptive right over the PI of the defaulting party was without
basis
order dated 27.06.2008 passed by this Court, the petitioner was given pre-emptive right to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs, which were sold ... invocation of such urgency clause deprived the petitioner of his legal pre-emptive right to purchase the property. There is no real urgency
argument that the applicants have filed the suit to enforce their pre-emptive rights which were granted to the Legal Representatives of one Late ... emptive right accrued to them through law. However, it has been argued by the learned counsel for the respondent that the right of pre-emption
Directors. It seems there was also a
clause which granted pre-emptive rights to the assessees to re-acquire ... could transfer such shares to a third party.
Nevertheless, this pre-emptive right with the assessees for purchasing
back the shares
assessee was entitled to mortgage the property and NOIDA had
pre-emptive right to purchase the mortgaged property subject to
deduction of a part ... also be mortgaged for raising loan. In such an eventuality the
pre-emptive right to purchase was vested in NOIDA. The payment
right would have been available to Ponnayammal and Kolandayammal. Ponnayammal, namely the mother of the plaintiffs, did not exercise her right of pre-emptive purchase ... occasion for exercising such right did not arise. As such the appellants/plaintiffs cannot claim the right of pre-emptive purchase as against the first
Indian
Partition Act, he is entitled to have preemptive right and to purchase the
share of respondent, since the respondent has expressed his intentions ... public auction and proceeds thereof should be divided
equally, the preemptive right accrued in favour of appellant/plaintiff
cannot be denied nor the partition
sale executed in his favour, since he had a
pre-emptive right and he was ready and willing to deposit the amount
colonies to which
they are used to as they have pre-emptive rights to
continue to stray there. However, that is also an
extreme view
