Persons to whom right of pre-emption accrues-
(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the right of pre-emption in respect ... below :-
Section 5.-Cases in which right of pre-emption does not accrue:
(1) The right of pre-emption shall not accrue
suit for the enforcement of their right of pre-emption under the provisions contained in the Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred ... Persons to whom right of pre-emption accrues.--(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the right of pre-emption in respect
Ramshree (since deceased) seeking partition and her right of pre-emption to purchase the suit premises. The said suit was filed on 3.1.77, in which ... right of pre-emption to acquire the 3/4th share of the said property as per the provisions contained in The Rajasthan Pre-Emption
right of pre-emption instituted a suit against the purchaser relying upon Section 15(a) of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913. The suit came ... shares. It is clear law that there can be no partial pre-emption because pre-emption is the substitution of the preemptor in place
share sold to an outsider. Thus before the right of pre-emption, under Section 4 , is exercised the conditions laid down therein have ... partition. Section 4 does not provide the co-sharer a right to pre-empt where the stranger/outsider does nothing after purchasing the share
2008 (1086/2008) before the trial court claiming their right of pre-emption in the suit property. In the said suit the decree dated ... submitted that while passing the decree in the pre-emption suit, the court is required to specify a day for the payment of purchase money
plaintiff has filed the suit claiming his right of pre-emption to purchase the suit premises though the partition of the property had already taken ... respondent No.1 has no right to claim right of pre-emption and by virtue of the impugned order the appellant is restrained from carrying
plaintiff has filed the suit claiming his right of pre-emption to purchase the suit premises though the partition of the property had already taken ... respondent No.1 has no right to claim right of pre-emption and by virtue of the impugned order the appellant is restrained from carrying
Mrs. Kusum Lata Agarwal vs State And Anr on 5 July, 2013
Author: Mn Bhandari
Sugan Singh & Ors vs State Of Raj & Nar on 5 July, 2013
Author
