Preeti Srivastava (Dr.)& Anr vs State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors on 10 August, 1999
Author: S.B.Majmudar
Bench: S.B.Majmudar , Sujata ... Khare
CASE NO.:
Writ Petition (civil) 290 of 1997
PETITIONER:
PREETI SRIVASTAVA (DR.)& ANR.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT
Preeti Srivastava & Anr vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors on 10 August, 1999
Equivalent citations: AIR 1999 SUPREME COURT ... Author: S.B.Majmudar
Bench: S.B.Majmudar
PETITIONER:
DR. PREETI SRIVASTAVA & ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
DATE
expressed by the Constitution Bench comprised of
Five Judges in Dr. Preeti Srivastava Vs. State of M.P. [(1999) 7 SCC
120] have any impact
Preeti Srivastava,Dr.Sadhna ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors,State ... on 10 August, 1999
Author: Sujata V. Manohar
Bench: K.Venkataswami ... Khare , Sujata V. Manohar
PETITIONER:
DR.PREETI SRIVASTAVA,DR.SADHNA DEVI,DR.ASHUTOSH AGRAWAL.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS,STATE
Court has not
understood the effect of the decision in Dr. Preeti Srivastava & Anr.
vs. State ... under Article 15(4); that as per the decision in Dr. Preeti Srivastavas
case (supra) not only reservation as set out in Article
Constitution
Bench of this Court in the case of Dr. Preeti Srivastava and
2 1992 Supp. ( 3) SCC 217
4
another vs. State ... cases disposed of by this Court in the case of
Dr. Preeti Srivastava (supra).
12. The learned Senior Counsel further submitted that since
the matters
Preeti Srivastava And Anr. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. ... on 10 August, 1999
Equivalent citations: (1999)3UPLBEC2179
JUDGMENT
Sujata V. Manohar
Court has not
understood the effect of the decision in Dr. Preeti Srivastava & Anr.
vs. State ... under Article 15(4); that as per the decision in Dr. Preeti Srivastavas
case (supra) not only reservation as set out in Article
that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Dr. Preeti
Srivastava and another vs. State of M.P. and others , reported ... others , reported in (2019) 10 SCC 1, the
position elucidated in Preeti Srivastava (supra) has been reiterated. It has
further affirmed the view taken
after considering the judgment of "Preeti Srivastava (Dr.) v.
State of M.P." [(1999) 7 SCC 120]. In the majority opinion of Modern ... find any ground for holding that Preeti
Srivastava [Preeti Srivastava v. State of M.P. , (1999) 7 SCC 120
: 1 SCEC 742] excludes the role
