Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4620 (0.03 seconds)

Surinder Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 30 March, 2007

should be prepared on the basis of the marks obtained in preferential qualification (i.e. Matriculation) if such candidates are available, otherwise on the basis ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above Matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 83 - L S Panta - Full Document

Dr. L. Krishna vs State Of Karnataka on 15 June, 1984

medicine before this Court principally on the ground that possessing the preferential qualification, he should have been, as of right, called for interview and selected ... Direct Recruitment Selection Rules, but also the applicants who possessed the preferential qualification or qualifications stated in the Collegiate Recruitment Rules. If such a course
Karnataka High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Smt. Malvika Singh vs U.P. Subordinate Services Selection ... on 11 September, 1997

basis of and taking into consideration the overall academic qualification, preferential qualification, her experiences in service of more than 4 years in Government Girls Inter ... Degree or Diploma in Education from a recognised University. The preferential qualification given in the advertisement were : (a) certificate in Territorial Army format least
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - O P Garg - Full Document

Berojgar Audyogik Kalyan Samiti And 39 ... vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors on 4 January, 2023

which itself discloses that CITS qualification has been specified only as a desirable qualification and not as essential qualification. Thus, Rules, 2014 are in conformity ... Rules, 2014. Thus, an additional qualification has been prescribed in Rule 9B which is not essential qualification but a preferential qualification. Therefore, to hold
Allahabad High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar-Iv - Full Document

Dr. Naresh Chauhan vs State Of Haryana And Others on 7 February, 2014

petitioner who possesses Masters in Medicines (M.D.) and having the preferential qualification should have been appointed over and above selected candidates i.e. respondents ... fulfilled by the petitioner and also having Doctor in Medicine, the preferential qualification, petitioner applied for the said post through proper channel. 41 applications from
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next