Search Results Page

Search Results

21 - 30 of 4620 (1.59 seconds)

Pearl Sidhu vs State Of Punjab And Others on 29 April, 2013

considered prior for appointment, but when a candidate without that preferential qualification, secures higher marks as has been assessed by the selecting authority, the said ... essential qualification which made them eligible). Candidates possessing the basic qualification which has been treated as a preferential qualification as mentioned in the Rules governing
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 6 - A G Masih - Full Document

Amaliyar Jayeshkumar Vichiyabhai & 18 vs State Of Gujarat & on 19 February, 2014

addition   to   the  requisite   qualification,   the   petitioners   also   possess   the  preferential   qualification   of   Advanced   Training   Institute  (ATI)/Central   Training   Institute   (CTI).   The   petitioners,  therefore,   claim ... that   having   regard   to   the   preferential  qualification   possessed   by   them   they   ought   to   be   given  priority in the matter of selection for appointment
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - K Jhaveri - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Dubey vs Union Of India on 26 November, 2013

EDDA should be on the basis of the marks obtained in preferential qualification (i.e. matriculation) if such candidates are available, otherwise on the basis ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 22 July, 2024

difference in desirable or preferential qualification and essential qualification. If a candidate does not possess essential qualification, then he is ineligible for the post. Since ... candidates having preferential qualification are given a preference over other candidates who possess the essential qualification but do not possess the preferential qualification. 42. Although
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M. Sekar vs Union Of India on 10 June, 2008

extracted:- "In our view, in service jurisprudence the prescription of preferential qualification not only refers to numeric superiority but is essentially related to better ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above Matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document

M. Sekar vs Union Of India (Uoi) Rep. By Senior ... on 10 June, 2008

usefully extracted: In our view, in service jurisprudence the prescription of preferential qualification not only refers to numeric superiority but is essentially related to better ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above Matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document

Dr. Albina vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 8 May, 2026

stipulates a particular qualification as the minimum qualification for the post and further stipulates that preference should be given for higher qualification, the only meaning ... preferential right to be selected. In such view of the matter, the claim of the petitioner is that she was having preferential qualification, therefore, preference
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Omprakash vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 April, 2026

Craft Instructor Training Scheme (CITS) by treating it merely as a preferential qualification with limited weightage of 10 marks, instead of recognizing ... Crafts Instructor Training Scheme (CITS) was treated only as a preferential qualification carrying limited weightage of 10 marks, instead of being prescribed as an essential
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3   4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next