Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 80 (0.79 seconds)

Sunil Kumar And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 20 December, 2017

petitioners an indefeasible right for appointment. Possession of the essential qualification was a pre-requisite and in the absence of the same, petitioners cannot claim ... least 2nd Division. (d) Must have passed Punjabi upto Matric Preferential Qualification: Graduation in Commerce. Clause 12 of the advertisement laid down the selection procedure
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 4 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Deepa vs T. Dravidaselvi on 17 November, 2017

inconvenience, the appointing authority may promote any other person who possesses the qualification, if any, prescribed for the higher category. (3) A person temporarily promoted ... category or be entitled by reason only of such promotion to any preferential claim to future promotion to such higher category. The services
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kamlesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 20 March, 2017

alone, is a well-established one. A person who acquires the prescribed qualification subsequent to such prescribed date cannot be considered at all. An advertisement ... prescribed date, they could not have been treated on a preferential basis. Their applications ought to have been rejected at the inception itself. This proposition
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next