Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 348 (0.88 seconds)

Ashok Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 22 July, 2024

difference in desirable or preferential qualification and essential qualification. If a candidate does not possess essential qualification, then he is ineligible for the post. Since ... candidates having preferential qualification are given a preference over other candidates who possess the essential qualification but do not possess the preferential qualification. 42. Although
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M.P.S.Yadav vs Union Of India on 11 December, 2024

respective post and in the service jurisprudence the prescription of preferential qualification not only refers to numeric superiority, but is essentially related to better mental ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above Matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M R Phadke - Full Document

Ms. Priti Upadhyay vs Banaras Hindu University Varanasi And 3 ... on 12 March, 2024

while the University Act have prescribed for additional qualification as a preferential qualification but could not have modified the minimum qualification prescribed as eligibility ... Agarwal that providing a qualification falls within the domain of the employer either by way of additional qualification or preferential qualification. The minimum standards
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Sunil Kumar vs The Union Of India on 17 May, 2024

rules framed in the respective States making the CITS a preferential qualification to be perfectly in order. The States' power under Article ... which has not provided CITS either as a mandatory qualification or educational qualification. This also is in tandem with the Rules of 2018. The advertisement
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajiw Ranjan vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2024

rules framed in the respective States making the CITS a preferential qualification to be perfectly in order. The States' power under Article ... which has not provided CITS either as a mandatory qualification or educational qualification. This also is in tandem with the Rules of 2018. The advertisement
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nagendra Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2024

rules framed in the respective States making the CITS a preferential qualification to be perfectly in order. The States' power under Article ... which has not provided CITS either as a mandatory qualification or educational qualification. This also is in tandem with the Rules of 2018. The advertisement
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Golden Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2024

rules framed in the respective States making the CITS a preferential qualification to be perfectly in order. The States' power under Article ... which has not provided CITS either as a mandatory qualification or educational qualification. This also is in tandem with the Rules of 2018. The advertisement
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kaushik Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2024

rules framed in the respective States making the CITS a preferential qualification to be perfectly in order. The States' power under Article ... which has not provided CITS either as a mandatory qualification or educational qualification. This also is in tandem with the Rules of 2018. The advertisement
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next