case selection of candidate on the basis of marks
obtained in preferential qualification was under consideration.
Under those facts of the case observations are made ... judgment. In the present case there is no
question of any preferential qualification. We do not find that
this judgment is applicable to the present
case selection of candidate on the basis of marks
obtained in preferential qualification was under consideration.
Under those facts of the case observations are made ... judgment. In the present case there is no
question of any preferential qualification. We do not find that
this judgment is applicable to the present
case selection of candidate on the basis of marks
obtained in preferential qualification was under consideration.
Under those facts of the case observations are made ... judgment. In the present case there is no
question of any preferential qualification. We do not find that
this judgment is applicable to the present
Anil D Ambani vs Indian Overseas Bank (Iob) on 24 December, 2025
Author: Milind N
Anil D Ambani vs Bank Of Baroda on 24 December, 2025
Author: Milind N. Jadhav
Anil D Ambani vs Idbi Bank Ltd on 24 December, 2025
Author: Milind N. Jadhav
these merely because, a particular candidate is in
possession of an additional qualification on the basis of which, a
preference has also been envisaged ... possess the required minimum educational qualification
with which they are entitled to compete with those possessing
additional qualification too, and demonstrate their superiority
meritwise
these merely because, a particular candidate is in
possession of an additional qualification on the basis of which, a
preference has also been envisaged ... possess the required minimum educational qualification
with which they are entitled to compete with those possessing
additional qualification too, and demonstrate their superiority
meritwise
Clerk' were to be filled by direct recruitment and
through Preferential Treatment cases. He would submit that 33% were
required to be filled ... Petitioner - Corporation gave repeated
opportunities to Respondent - members to produce the required
qualification within a period of two years. However 27 Respondent -
members failed
Suresh Narayan Kakde And 3 Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors on 14
