Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 56 (1.01 seconds)

Berojgar Audyogik Kalyan Samiti And 39 ... vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors on 4 January, 2023

which itself discloses that CITS qualification has been specified only as a desirable qualification and not as essential qualification. Thus, Rules, 2014 are in conformity ... Rules, 2014. Thus, an additional qualification has been prescribed in Rule 9B which is not essential qualification but a preferential qualification. Therefore, to hold
Allahabad High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar-Iv - Full Document

Saima Ashraf vs Government Of Jammu And Kashmir (Ut) ... on 27 March, 2023

alone, is a well- established one. A person who acquires the prescribed qualification subsequent to such prescribed date cannot be considered at all. An advertisement ... prescribed date, they could not have been treated on a preferential basis. Their applications ought to have been rejected at the inception itself. This proposition
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - N K Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next