Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 829 (0.97 seconds)

Surinder Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 30 March, 2007

should be prepared on the basis of the marks obtained in preferential qualification (i.e. Matriculation) if such candidates are available, otherwise on the basis ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above Matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 83 - L S Panta - Full Document

Berojgar Audyogik Kalyan Samiti And 39 ... vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors on 4 January, 2023

which itself discloses that CITS qualification has been specified only as a desirable qualification and not as essential qualification. Thus, Rules, 2014 are in conformity ... Rules, 2014. Thus, an additional qualification has been prescribed in Rule 9B which is not essential qualification but a preferential qualification. Therefore, to hold
Allahabad High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar-Iv - Full Document

Pearl Sidhu vs State Of Punjab And Others on 29 April, 2013

considered prior for appointment, but when a candidate without that preferential qualification, secures higher marks as has been assessed by the selecting authority, the said ... essential qualification which made them eligible). Candidates possessing the basic qualification which has been treated as a preferential qualification as mentioned in the Rules governing
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 6 - A G Masih - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Dubey vs Union Of India on 26 November, 2013

EDDA should be on the basis of the marks obtained in preferential qualification (i.e. matriculation) if such candidates are available, otherwise on the basis ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M. Sekar vs Union Of India on 10 June, 2008

extracted:- "In our view, in service jurisprudence the prescription of preferential qualification not only refers to numeric superiority but is essentially related to better ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above Matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document

M. Sekar vs Union Of India (Uoi) Rep. By Senior ... on 10 June, 2008

usefully extracted: In our view, in service jurisprudence the prescription of preferential qualification not only refers to numeric superiority but is essentially related to better ... preferential qualification by way of a clear stipulation that no preference should be given to the qualification above Matriculation. Hence, the preferential qualification was considered
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next