several counts. The primary contention being that the
petitioner's preferential right, as owner of the land, to redevelop such land
occupied ... primarily for the reason
that there is no preferential right accrued in favour of the
petitioner to undertake the re-development of the land
violation of Section 22
of the HSA, 1956 which gives a preferential right or the right of pre-
emption to Class-I heirs including ... that preferential rights were given in the right of succession to
family properties and a qualification has been put on the right to transfer
property
share of
plaintiff and (v) prayer for granting right to preferential right under
Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (for short ... executed by her. It is also
denied that the plaintiff has preferential right to purchase the suit
house as per the provisions of Section
2018 22:57:38 :::HCHP
3
attack by the plaintiff, claiming preferential rights by virtue
of Section 22 of the Succession Act. Plaintiff filed ... challenging the sale deed for the reason that he had a
preferential right to acquire the interest transferred in terms
of the instrument of sale
filed a suit for
declaration to the effect that he has preferential right to
acquire/purchase the property qua 193/1380 share measuring 0-
Whether ... defendant No. 1/appellant is the direct attack on the
preferential rights of the plaintiff and the same is required to be
declared as wrong
petitioner are first considered and disposed of by according
priority or preferential right based on the petitioner being a first day applicant having applied ... Preferential right, as used in section-11, is neither a vested right nor a substantive
right as it is not an absolute right enforceable
initiatives.
5. The Petitioners contend that Self-Help Groups have a
preferential right to participate in the distribution of the Take
Home Ration based ... State Government
acknowledges that Self-Help Groups had such a preferential right
under the previous policy, regime the new policy, reflected
through changes
initiatives.
5. The Petitioners contend that Self-Help Groups have a
preferential right to participate in the distribution of the Take
Home Ration based ... State Government
acknowledges that Self-Help Groups had such a preferential right
under the previous policy, regime the new policy, reflected
through changes
initiatives.
5. The Petitioners contend that Self-Help Groups have a
preferential right to participate in the distribution of the Take
Home Ration based ... State Government
acknowledges that Self-Help Groups had such a preferential right
under the previous policy, regime the new policy, reflected
through changes
initiatives.
5. The Petitioners contend that Self-Help Groups have a
preferential right to participate in the distribution of the Take
Home Ration based ... State Government
acknowledges that Self-Help Groups had such a preferential right
under the previous policy, regime the new policy, reflected
through changes
