Slum Act ? Whether the owner of the land would have a preferential right
to undertake re-development or the only method to redevelop such areas ... under section 3C(1) of the Slum Act
would have a preferential right under section 3B(4)(c) and (e) read with
section
property and as the owner of
the suit property she had preferential right to undertake redevelopment
in view of the statutory provisions of the Slum ... follows:
Petitioner as an owner of the subject property has
preferential right to carry out redevelopment of the property, the right
being borne out from
junior widow, that the senior widow, who had the preferential right to adopt, had relinquished her right by the deed, which has been acted upon ... series of cases that a senior widow has a preferential right of adoption and that a junior widow cannot adopt without the senior widow
Slum Act ? Whether the owner of the land would have a preferential right
to undertake re-development or the only method to redevelop such areas ... under section 3C(1) of the Slum Act
would have a preferential right under section 3B(4)(c) and (e) read with
section
several counts. The primary contention being that the
petitioner's preferential right, as owner of the land, to redevelop such land
occupied ... primarily for the reason
that there is no preferential right accrued in favour of the
petitioner to undertake the re-development of the land
initiatives.
5. The Petitioners contend that Self-Help Groups have a
preferential right to participate in the distribution of the Take
Home Ration based ... State Government
acknowledges that Self-Help Groups had such a preferential right
under the previous policy, regime the new policy, reflected
through changes
initiatives.
5. The Petitioners contend that Self-Help Groups have a
preferential right to participate in the distribution of the Take
Home Ration based ... State Government
acknowledges that Self-Help Groups had such a preferential right
under the previous policy, regime the new policy, reflected
through changes
initiatives.
5. The Petitioners contend that Self-Help Groups have a
preferential right to participate in the distribution of the Take
Home Ration based ... State Government
acknowledges that Self-Help Groups had such a preferential right
under the previous policy, regime the new policy, reflected
through changes
initiatives.
5. The Petitioners contend that Self-Help Groups have a
preferential right to participate in the distribution of the Take
Home Ration based ... State Government
acknowledges that Self-Help Groups had such a preferential right
under the previous policy, regime the new policy, reflected
through changes
such notice and opposed the proposed acquisition and also claimed
preferential right to develop the subject land under the Slum Act .
6.4 On 13th February ... Respondent No. 2 and
opposed the said acquisition and claimed a preferential right to develop the subject
land under the Slum Act .
6.6 However
