such Application. On
these preliminary grounds, the Original Respondent No.1
(Gangakhed Sugar Factory) urged to frame preliminary
issues of jurisdiction, limitation and locus ... have discussed these issues peripherally in
order to demonstrate that framing of these issues at the
preliminary stage may not be essential
entered into between the parties.
3. In the application for framing preliminary issue and dismissal of the complaint, it has been submitted that ... Arbitration.
5. Complainant filed reply to the application for framing preliminary issue and dismissal of the complaint taking preliminary objections that the application
Original Application No. 82/2000 rejecting the prayer for framing preliminary issue regarding maintainability of the Original Application against the appellant, who claims
preliminary issue, the Court shall, subject to the provisions of Sub-rule (2), pronounce judgment on all issues.
(2) Where issues both ... issue of law only, with the further limitation that the issue to be tried as a preliminary issue must relate
which the
following prayer was made:-
"a) Frame the preliminary issue about the validity of consents given
by the consenting shareholders and maintainability ... petition as a preliminary issue, the Tribunal
did not frame the preliminary issue rather it ordered that it shall be heard
with
such
application.
21. It is argued that the preliminary issue is required
to be framed under Order 14, Rule ... mention here that there
is no specific power available to frame preliminary issue
under Order 14, Rule 2, or to dispose of the matter
CETP Co. Op. Society Ltd., praying there-in to frame preliminary issues
and decide the same on preliminary stage before adjudication of Original
Application
Second Amendment Act, 2018
which provides that where consideration of preliminary issue
framed under section 9A is pending on the date of
commencement ... created by the provision of section 2 where consideration of
preliminary issue framed under section 9A is pending on the date
of commencement
complainant, it appears, he has raised objection for framing preliminary issues
separately, and not along with the merits of the case. He, inter-alia ... objection way back on October 06, 2004. Further, as those preliminary issues framed therein have not been
considered till date, due to long chequered
District
Commission committed error on deciding the complaint by framing
preliminary issues, when they are not contemplated in the Consumer
Protection Act . For which
