joint application filed by the
petitioner and the respondent for preponement of the case.
5. On 11.07.2019, the petitioner with his counsel
and the respondent ... joint application
was filed by the petitioner and the respondent for preponement
of case. The said application bears signature of the respondent
plaintiff had failed to supply copy of the application for
preponement of the case and on the ground that the plaintiff has
failed to file ... service for the defendant
for 14.05.09. However, an application for preponement of the
case has been filed by the plaintiff disposed by Ld. Trial Court
been duly informed by the ARC on
31.05.2010 that the case stood preponed from 15.07.2010 to
31.05.2010. Further, it leaves no room for doubt about
under
the PWDV Act qua the wife, and as such since cross cases were
CA 322/2023 Dr Bindu Suri Vs Uditi Wadhwa Page ... Trial Court heard the wife only at length, and declined to
prepone the case of the mother-in-law, and did not hear
ment Rangappa Vs. Mohan AIR 2010 SC 1898.
29. In the present case, DW1 Sh. Abhishek Gupta has pleaded in his writ-
ten statement ... this background it was for the plaintiff to prove its case on prepon-
derance of probabilities but he has been failed
plaintiff
by respondents/defendants no. 2 and 3 during pendency of the case as
appellant/plaintiff was beaten, confined and threatened with dire
consequences ... photographs as placed by appellant/plaintiff
by way of application for preponment of case as respondents/defendants
no. 2 and 3 by greasing the plans
some occasions. He moved an
application dated 22.9.05 for preponment of the case in which it stands
mentioned that due to some inadvertance, evidence could ... concerning perusal of the
complaint by moving an application for preponment. In between case
was transferred to other court and complainant appeared thereafter
also
civil cases the plaintiff has to prove its case on preponder
ance of probability and in the present case, when the defence of
the defendant ... hold that the plaintiff has been able to prove its case by prepon-
CS (COMM)No. 673/2021 Page 18 of 20
DR. ROSHAL
place to mention that during the trial of
this case, this matter was referred to Mediation Centre for the
parties to explore the possibility ... hold
that the plaintiffs have been able to prove its case by prepon-
derance of probability that the goods in question were sold to
defendants
order
dated 26.2.2010 ordered that
"On the facts of the case we modify the impugned judgment dated 6.10.2009 by
directing that the petitioner shall ... Supreme Court of India to expedite this case. The
application was allowed the case was preponed. By that time, the plaintiff has moved an
applications
