liable to be declared as
nullity because he arbitrarily preponed the date of hearing and decided the
application of respondent No.3 without bothering ... argued that the explanation given by respondent No.1
for preponing the date of hearing, i.e., fixation of excess number of cases
hearing of the said
application for bail was again adjourned to 07.04.2015 and
ultimately the date of hearing was fixed on 16.04.2015. The
hearing ... date of hearing of Criminal Misc.
Case No.3258 of 2015 from 13.05.2015 to 11.05.2015, but the
date of hearing was preponed after arrival
liable to be declared as
nullity because he arbitrarily preponed the date of hearing and decided the
application of respondent No.3 without bothering ... argued that the explanation given by respondent No.1
for preponing the date of hearing, i.e., fixation of excess number of cases
passing of the
impugned disqualification order, the notice dated 17.06.2020 preponing the
date of hearing of the disqualification cases from ... preponing
the hearing of the disqualification cases from 22.06.2020 to 18.06.2020
with failure to provide reasons for such preponing as well as hearing
passing of the impugned
disqualification order, the notice dated 17.06.2020 preponing the date of
hearing of the disqualification cases from ... preponing
the hearing of the disqualification cases from 22.06.2020 to 18.06.2020
with failure to provide reasons for such preponing as well as hearing
learned counsel for the petitioner that the Additional Commissioner preponed the date of hearing of Revision from 04.08.2015 to 03.08.2015 in the absence ... parties and after hearing them on 01.08.2015, fixed the date for further hearing on 03.08.2015. Copies of orders dated 01.08.2015, 03.08.2015, and 04.08.2015 have been
health condition the Court, on
humanitarian grounds the court might prepone the date of hearing of the
petition under Section ... sheet that when the
learned Magistrate expressed his inability to prepone the date of hearing
of the application under Section
There is no objection by respondent No.3 in preponing the date
of hearing of the main appeal i.e. FAO-10667-2018.
Therefore, this ... Court considers it appropriate to prepone the
date of hearing of the main appeal i.e. FAO-10667-2018 from
PSPCL
seeking preponement of date of hearing from 11.1.2019 as also vacating the
interim order dated 13.3.2018. Order dated 15.10.2018 in the said two
applications ... applications; one for vacating the interim order dated
13.3.2018 and the other for preponing date of hearing of
the main case listed
same day for date
already fixed and that too without any formal order on application of
preponement of the date of hearing. On 17.12.2018, respondent ... case was also not proper. Ld. Trial Court preponed date of hearing on multiple
occasions without any speaking order and rather recorded ex-parte evidence
