Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 285 (0.92 seconds)

K.R.Ramasamy vs Saraswathi

enjoying the properties by themselves and through their vendor acquired prescriptive title by adverse possession. The sale deed alleged to have been executed by Alagarsamy ... virtue of their open, uninterrupted and hostile possession, they acquired prescriptive title. Accordingly, they prayed for the dismissal of the suit. http://www.judis
Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - R Pongiappan - Full Document

Judgment Reserved On Judgment ... vs Jayalakshmi

police. In the plaint, she has also stated that she had prescriptive title by adverse possession for more than 12 years against the defendant / land ... also reserved her rights to file separate suit for prescriptive title by adverse possession. 7. On the basis pleadings of both sides, the learned
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Judgment Reserved On Judgment ... vs Jayalakshmi

police. In the plaint, she has also stated that she had prescriptive title by adverse possession for more than 12 years against the defendant / land ... also reserved her rights to file separate suit for prescriptive title by adverse possession. 7. On the basis pleadings of both sides, the learned
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr.Justin Prakash vs Mrs.Konika Parekh

instituted the present suit for a declaration of his prescriptive title to the suit property by adverse possession. ● In its written statement, the bank contested ... plaintiff’s claim of prescriptive title to the suit property by adverse possession. It defended the proceedings that it had initiated before
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Seshasayee - Full Document

Mr.Justin Prakash vs Mrs.Konika Parekh

instituted the present suit for a declaration of his prescriptive title to the suit property by adverse possession. ● In its written statement, the bank contested ... plaintiff’s claim of prescriptive title to the suit property by adverse possession. It defended the proceedings that it had initiated before
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Seshasayee - Full Document

Shanmugam vs The Child Trust

defendants to contend that their possession is adverse to the interest and title of the second plaintiff Annapoorani Ammal. Holding so, the first appellate Court ... Whether on the admitted facts, the defendants have not acquired prescriptive title in accordance with the principles laid down
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - B Rajendran - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next