Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 69 (0.69 seconds)

M.Sekar vs State Rep. By on 16 September, 2019

closed from the proceeds of the said DD. Against the same, primary security amounting to double financing without due approval from his superiors. Thereby, kept ... concerns. Shri M.Sekar allowed operations in the account against same primary security already hypothecated to SBI, amounting to double financing, without due approval
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

A.Gopal vs R.Thangapandi on 10 April, 2026

account and petitioner gave his cheque as security. This cheque misused by the petitioner is the primary defence. DW1 and DW2 admit that both were ... Even after receipt of statutory notice, no steps taken to collect the security cheque. DW2 confirms that even after receipt of Statutory notice
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next