revoked, It only sought to
improve from the existing prior art as Quinazoline compounds are
known to inhibit growth have been used as anti cancer ... statement
Mark DW4/24 US PTO - Obviousness of Species when
prior art teaches genus
Mark DW4/25 Natco Pharma Ltd. App. for
ERLOTINIB
effect that Patent invalid as it obvious in view of
prior art filed along with the counter claim. The suit patent also
lacks utility ... patent and the claims are obvious in view of existing
prior art :
It is argued on behalf of defendants that Dasatinib is covered
by Indian
alleged by the
plaintiff as the same is anticipated by prior art.
19. In nut shell, the case of the defendants in substance ... prior arts
which if are examined, then the invention becomes obvious to a
person skilled in the art. Shri Jaitley categorized the said prior arts
instead of the methyl group. He submits that none of the prior art, indicated by the Defendant discloses the presence of an ethynyl group particularly ... specific structure is not disclosed in the prior Article In other words, no prior art documents discloses this very specific structure. Erlotinib hydrochloride
device as explained by the
plaintiff in the said patent is prior art and there is no valid ground on which
the said device ... Each one of the
claims of the plaintiff is part of prior art and various patents have been
granted in respect of the technology claimed
spark plugs in an IC engine was a prior art for which no patent could have been applied for and that the Respondent resorted ... Respondent under patent No.195904 as the same was hit by prior art, apart from the special characteristics of three valves in the Appellant
compound has been
disclosed with specificity. In other words, if prior art discloses a family of
compounds with a general formula, which includes a particular ... anticipation by prior publication does not apply in this
case for the following reasons.
a) IN 147 is not prior art as it was published
conventional symmetric beam pattern of the
antennae in the prior art. The asymmetric beam
pattern of the invention radically alters the
conventional model of symmetric ... pattern, which in view of the prior art
references identified hereinabove, was well known in
the art prior to the plaintiffs‟ invention. The expert
prior to the suit patent IN 161. It was
a technical advancement over Eltrombopag per se, which was claimed
and disclosed in prior art ... fact, been no prior claiming of EO, prior to IN 161.
He emphasises, in this context, the words "prior claiming", as
contained
patent was earlier taught by a European patent which,
therefore, constituted prior art and divested the plaintiff's patent of
novelty. Without entering into ... could not be regarded as, prima facie, prior art which taught the
plaintiff's invention. Paras 21 to 23 of the report alone
