passed following the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Prithipal Singh & Co. , amounts to review of order?
2. The assessee is engaged ... Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Prithipal Singh & Co. , reported in (2001) 249 ITR 670 (SC) held that
provide a scope for levying any
penalty, vide CIT v. PRITHIPAL SINGH AND CO. (183 ITR 69).
4.5. The view taken by the Punjab ... Haryana High Court in CIT v.
PRITHIPAL SINGH AND CO. (183 ITR 69) was upheld by the Supreme Court in CIT
v. PRITHIPAL SINGH
provide a scope for levying any penalty, vide CIT v. Prithipal Singh and Co. 183 ITR 69.
4.5. The view taken by the Punjab ... Haryana High Court in CIT v. Prithipal Singh and Co. 183 ITR 69 was upheld by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Prithipal Singh
duty to protect women and it will not hesitate to. In Prithipal Singh vs. State of Punjab
stated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Prithipal Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in (2012) 1 SCC 10 that while dealing with
Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Prithipal Singh and Co. [1990] 183 ITR 69, 71, wherein, the court held that ... decision of the Supreme Court is reported as CIT v. Prithipal Singh and Co. [2001] 249 ITR 670.
12. The High Court of Kerala
appellant relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Prithipal Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors. and another judgment of the Supreme Court
Kasim Mapkar & Ors. reported in
2010 (6) Supreme 95
(6)Prithipal Singh etc. v. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2011 (7) Supreme
Relied on the case of “Prithipal Singh etc Versus State of Punjab
& Anr., etc., reported in (2012) 1 SCC 10”, for the point that
Unknown vs State Represented By on 16 October, 2015
Author: N.Kirubakaran
Bench: N.Kirubakaran
