Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited vs E! Entertainment Television Llc on 31 May, 2023
Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited vs E! Entertainment Television Llc on 31 May, 2023
Author
Search Results Page
Search Results
51 - 60 of 9417 (1.50 seconds)Shri. Ashfaque Shaikh Abdul Rehman ... vs M/S Ramkrishna Resort Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai. ... on 9 May, 2024
supports the
case of the plaintiff.
15.12 Hence, in my view, 'nuisance' and 'annoyance' has to
been seen from the eyes ... Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960,
what is envisaged is private nuisance and not public nuisance.
15.14 The defendants failed to prove that there
Shri. Ashfaque Shaikh Abdul Rehman ... vs M/S Ramkrishna Resort Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai. ... on 9 May, 2024
supports the
case of the plaintiff.
15.12 Hence, in my view, 'nuisance' and 'annoyance' has to
been seen from the eyes ... Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960,
what is envisaged is private nuisance and not public nuisance.
15.14 The defendants failed to prove that there
Ashfaque Shaikh Abdul Rehman Since Dec ... vs Ramkrishna Resort Pvt Ltd. And Ors on 9 May, 2024
supports the
case of the plaintiff.
15.12 Hence, in my view, 'nuisance' and 'annoyance' has to
been seen from the eyes ... Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960,
what is envisaged is private nuisance and not public nuisance.
15.14 The defendants failed to prove that there
Shri. Ashfaque Shaikh Abdul Rehman vs M/S Ramkrishna Resorts Pvt. Ltd. And Ors on 9 May, 2024
supports the
case of the plaintiff.
15.12 Hence, in my view, 'nuisance' and 'annoyance' has to
been seen from the eyes ... Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960,
what is envisaged is private nuisance and not public nuisance.
15.14 The defendants failed to prove that there
Shri. Ashfaque Shaikh Abdul Rehman ... vs M/S Ramkrishna Resort Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai. ... on 9 May, 2024
supports the
case of the plaintiff.
15.12 Hence, in my view, 'nuisance' and 'annoyance' has to
been seen from the eyes ... Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960,
what is envisaged is private nuisance and not public nuisance.
15.14 The defendants failed to prove that there
Sri Shivananda Sharma vs Smt. Shantha Nagesha Rao on 28 July, 2023
observed
that constant noise, if abnormal or unusual, can be an actionable
nuisance if it interferes with one's physical comforts. Even ... noise will amount to actionable nuisance. The right to commit a
private nuisance can in certain circumstances, be acquired either
prescription or by the authority
Mamtaben Rakesh Medtiya vs Jayantibhai Narsinh Patel on 16 June, 2025
public nuisance. However, there is no specific report on
record which indicates that working of Bhavani Tin Fabricators
caused inconvenience and public nuisance ... petitioner, public nuisance is
caused and not private nuisance. Learned advocate appearing
for the petitioner, has taken this Court to impugned order
confirmed
Mohammad Altaf Bhat vs K. K. Sethi And Another" Reported In ... on 5 April, 2019
accrue was to fall in the category of private nuisance. The
remedies for private nuisance are (1) Abatement (2) Damages and
(c) Injunction. In Order
Sushilabai W/O Narayan Raut And Ors. vs Navnit S/O Bhojraj Lakhotiya on 30 July, 2004
what shall mean nuisance for the purposes of nuisance under Clause (ix). For the purposes of Clause 13(3)(ix), nuisance would mean ... Talbot J. in Gunard and Wife v. Antifyre Ltd., observed that private nuisance could be confined to that which is injurious to property. In Read