filed on
ground of breach of trust and directions of Court are
necessary for administration of Trust; they are also seeking
for removal of trustees ... petition
lacks specific plea about breach of trust and filed in private
interest as it was after removal of petitioner no.1 and
husband
private trust and the properties of the trust are
being utilized for the welfare of the trust. PW.1 is specific
that the properties ... highlighted the distinguishing
features between the private and public trust. The
distinction between private trust and public trust, it is
observed
personal law, or applies to public or private
religious or charitable endowments, or to trusts to distribute
prizes taken in war among the captors ... appellants was
misconceived. In the case of a private trust created for specific
individuals, the Kazi, whose place in the British Indian system is
taken
both side
itself states that respondent No.1 is a Private Trust. The
evidence of PW.1 that respondent No.1 Trust is a Charitable ... Private Trust, therefore such
permission is not required. Exception to Section 36 of the Trust
Act bars a Trustee from leasing the trust property
both side
itself states that respondent No.1 is a Private Trust. The
evidence of PW.1 that respondent No.1 Trust is a Charitable ... Private Trust, therefore such
permission is not required. Exception to Section 36 of the Trust
Act bars a Trustee from leasing the trust property
both side
itself states that respondent No.1 is a Private Trust. The
evidence of PW.1 that respondent No.1 Trust is a Charitable ... Private Trust, therefore such
permission is not required. Exception to Section 36 of the Trust
Act bars a Trustee from leasing the trust property
instituted and there
was a formation of the temple Trust and approval of the
trustees. The Assistant Commissioner way back in the year
2014 ordered ... consideration before this Court. The specific contention of
the defendant was that the suit property is not a private
property but a public temple property
private trust in
respect of Sri Venkataramana Swamy Temple and asserts
certain rights of management over the said institution. It
is the specific case
Development Trust and its Associates, the petitioner
was earlier known as Chilume Enterprises Private
Limited, petitioner being an Associate of the said
Trust ... counsel, I am of the
considered opinion that the Trust and the private
companies are two distinct entities in the eyes
The Commissioner, Bangalore ... vs State Of Karnataka And Anr. on 25 November, 2005
Equivalent citations
