Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 96 (0.72 seconds)

Mraditya Jain vs Gnctd on 25 May, 2016

affairs of  state, they cannot be withheld by state as privileged documents under  Evidence Act , but  has to disclose under  RTI Act , subject only ... privilege mentioned in  Section 8(1)(c)  is Parliamentary privilege, and if the information  sought might cause breach of Privilege of parliament or assembly, that
Central Information Commission Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Goel vs Icici Bank on 21 April, 2016

allegations constituting criminal offence and bank statement of complainant was only one document filed by Sudhakar in support of his complaint. The same ... complainant through process of court since such statement was not a privileged document disclosure of which could be withheld from criminal court. Thus
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M P Singh vs M/O Railways on 5 October, 2016

forged documents regarding his transfer does not stand conclusively proved". 11. Accordingly, a penalty of withholding of three (3) sets of Privilege passes ... supply of documents to the applicant. Ultimately, a lenient view was taken and minor penalty of stoppage of three (3) sets of Privilege passes
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhagwati vs A K Puthia on 23 February, 2016

find that the applicant had sought adjournment to produce certain documents and adduce more documents on record. Paragraphs 13 and 14 of the report read ... compulsory retired as he had taken Privilege pass in the name of his nephew Sarvesh as documents provided by the office
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next