stage of granting sanction. It was observed by the
Privy Council in Gokulchand Dwarkadas Vs. The King [AIR 1948 Privy
Council 82] that ... application of
mind. Relying on the dicta of the Privy Council in Gokulchand 's case, it has
been pointed out that no facts constituting
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs B. N. Thimmajamma & Others on 13 November, 1958
Equivalent citations
course of
decisions of this Court as also those of the Privy Council
and other High Courts, which we shall discuss presently.
In Lala Khunni ... valid settlement was fully approved of by
their Lordships of the Privy Council. In this connection the
High Court made the following observations , which were
under Letters Patent. Notwithstanding the clear
enunciation of law by the Privy Council that section 588 did
not affect nor was it inconsistent with ... Moreover, some of the decisions of this Court,
those of the Privy Council and other High Courts support the
propositions adumbrated by Mr. Sorabjee
from the said
judgment. This was followed by the Abolition of Privy
Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949 (Act V of 1949), which was
passed ... Council of 1860 the appellants filed the appeal in
the Privy Council. The respondent filed a petition before
the Privy Council praying that the appeal
incorrect to
say that the decision of the Privy Council in Subramania
Iyer's case as to what is an illegality has been modified ... subse-
1145
quent decisions of the Privy Council, and, in fact, in
Babulal Chowkhani's case Lord Wright in delivering the
judgment
counsel for the appellants relied upon the following
decisions of the Privy Council and this Court in support of
his contention that the said rules
parte."
A reference of series of cases decided by the Privy
Council and this Court would reveal true import, scope and
ambit of Section ... Cases decided prior to 1976 amendment both by the Privy
Council and the Supreme Court dealing with the scope of
Section
Shri Huzefa Ahmadi,
senior counsel. Various decisions of this Court and Privy Council and
English Courts have been cited in which the suit filed ... this
6
Court in which the decision of Privy Council in Musumut Chundrabullee
Debia v. Luchea Debia Chowdrain 1865 SCC Online PC 7 had been
purposes and this decision was affirmed by the Privy council
in Kaju Mall v. Salig Ram(1). It was held that the words "
agricultural ... Kesho Prasad Singh v. Sheo Pragash Ojha (3) the Privy
Council held that a grove was not land " held for
agricultural purposes " within
