favour of Bharat Singh, who was ancestor of plaintiffs
and pro forma respondents-defendants and that a receipt for `2,000/- dated
11.8.1967 was executed ... said mortgage had not been redeemed, hence, petitioner-plaintiff and pro
forma respondents-defendants have become owners in possession of the
same, after expiry
dated 2.4.2003 were
sanctioned in favour of appellant-plaintiff and pro forma respondents-
defendants on the basis of said sale deed. Further plea has been ... been rightly observed by learned Courts below
that appellant-plaintiff and pro forma defendants have been given entire 3
kanals of land purchased by them
that a suit for declaration was filed by present petitioner-plaintiff and pro
forma respondent-plaintiff to the effect that they along with pro forma ... record are totally wrong, illegal, null and void and
that plaintiffs and pro forma defendants are entitled to get their names
recorded in the revenue
Shri Basanta, plaintiff, defendants no.1 and 8 to 11 inherited the
said land. Thereafter, defendant no.1 and pro forma defendant no.11
became ... hence, the same are not binding upon the rights of
plaintiff and pro forma defendants no.8 to 10.
As is clear from the aforementioned
Procedure (hereinafter to
be referred as `the Code') filed by petitioner-plaintiff no.2 was set aside.
I have heard learned counsel ... decision of present revision petition are
that present petitioner-plaintiff no.2 alongwith pro forma respondent no.2-
plaintiff no.1 filed suit for permanent
that the suit for declaration was filed by present petitioner-plaintiff
alongwith pro forma respondents-plaintiffs on the ground that that they have
become owners
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Talwandi Sabo, vide
which evidence of the petitioners-plaintiffs has been closed by order.
I have heard learned counsel ... decision of present revision petition are
that petitioners-plaintiffs alongwith pro forma respondents no.5 to 8 filed a
suit for declaration that they
List of employees as on 31.7.2006 alongwith coverage pro
forma was provided by respondent no.1-plaintiff himself to the concerned
Officer of petitioner. Respondent
vide
which suit filed by respondent-plaintiff against father of present appellant-
defendant and the other pro forma respondents-defendants was decreed.
I have heard ... below.
Briefly stated, respondent no.1-plaintiff filed this suit for
recovery of `4,89,977.00 from pro forma respondents-defendants as well as
father
Ghuman, Advocate
for the respondents.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.
Petitioner-plaintiff has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this
Court under Article 227 of the Constitution ... Present petitioner and pro forma respondents no.4 to 6, i.e., plaintiffs filed
suit for declaration that the said sale deed executed by Sampuran
