pro forma defendant (pro forma defendant No. 7). This suit will be called hereinafter as the title suit and whenever the words plaintiffs or defendants ... filed by Mr. Monmohan Shaha on behalf of plaintiff No. 1 plaintiff No. 2 and pro forma defendant No. 7. It has been found that
last mentioned suit was brought by plaintiff 1, plaintiff 2 and their uncle, pro forma defendant 6, to establish their title to and recovery ... pro forma defendant 6 and he (Srenath Babu) made recommendations to him (the pro forma defendant 6.) When the said pro forma defendant 6 accepted
last mentioned suit was brought by plaintiff No. 1, plaintiff No. 2 and their uncle pro forma defendant No. 6, to establish their title ... pro forma defendant No. 6 and he (Srenath Babu) made recommendations to him (the pro forma defendant No. 6). When the said pro forma defendant
their tenants. In the suit as originally filed the present plaintiffs were pro forma defendants. Later on the Chakraburtties filed an application in Court ... plaintiffs and Chakraburtties were transferred to the category of pro forma defendants being made pro forma defendants 15 to 25 and the allegations made
also there is no inequity in the position of the plaintiffs and pro forma defendants regarded as proprietors of the estate ... because the plaintiffs have within their allotment one of the Shikmi Taluks. The position is that the plaintiffs and the pro forma defendants would
opposition either by the tenants or the original plaintiffs or any of the pro forma defendants on the record. But it is equally clear that ... previous orders adding the petitioners as pro forma defendants and later on transferring them as co-plaintiffs are orders which could be justified
death his sons that is, the pro forma defendants, sold the disputed land to the plaintiffs by a registered kobala on July ... execution of a decree against the pro forma defendants attached this property. The plaintiff No. 1 thereupon preferred a claim. This claim was dismissed
Land and Revenue Regulations. The question of the original title of the plaintiffs to the lands in suit, covered by the pottas mentioned above, which ... full Government rate from the plaintiffs and all other like tenants in possession. The plaintiffs and pro forma defendants and other tenants in possession, having
Rupa Bewa (pro forma defendant 4) and Ananda Bewa (pro forma defendant 5), three daughters Dhattri Mani (a sonless widow), Kausalya (plaintiff 1) and Padmabati ... Bewa (2nd wife) | |
| (pro forma defendant 4) Gobind Prodhan Ram Krishna Prodhan
| Annada Bewa (3rd wife) (defendant 2) (defendant 1)
| (pro forma defendant 6)
|______________________________________
_______________________________|___________________________
| | | |
Sital
preliminary decree in a suit on mortgage commenced by the plaintiff. The decree is dated 15th February 1932. The suit was to enforce a mortgage ... grandsons by his son Raghunath. The relationship between the plaintiff and some of the pro forma defendants to the suit may be shown as follows
