favour of Bharat Singh, who was ancestor of plaintiffs
and pro forma respondents-defendants and that a receipt for `2,000/- dated
11.8.1967 was executed ... said mortgage had not been redeemed, hence, petitioner-plaintiff and pro
forma respondents-defendants have become owners in possession of the
same, after expiry
dated 2.4.2003 were
sanctioned in favour of appellant-plaintiff and pro forma respondents-
defendants on the basis of said sale deed. Further plea has been ... been rightly observed by learned Courts below
that appellant-plaintiff and pro forma defendants have been given entire 3
kanals of land purchased by them
that a suit for declaration was filed by present petitioner-plaintiff and pro
forma respondent-plaintiff to the effect that they along with pro forma ... record are totally wrong, illegal, null and void and
that plaintiffs and pro forma defendants are entitled to get their names
recorded in the revenue
Shastri Nagar, Delhi-110031. The version of the
plaintiff is that the father of the plaintiff Late Sh. Karam Chand, mother
Late Smt. Vishan Devi ... brother of the plaintiff and the
defendant no. 2 is the wife of the plaintiff (pro forma defendant).
2. That on 12.02.1998 the mother
Shri Basanta, plaintiff, defendants no.1 and 8 to 11 inherited the
said land. Thereafter, defendant no.1 and pro forma defendant no.11
became ... hence, the same are not binding upon the rights of
plaintiff and pro forma defendants no.8 to 10.
As is clear from the aforementioned
suit
plot in favour of pro forma defendant Laxmidhar Paikaray by executing Registered Sale
Deed dated 17.2.1984. Plaintiff purchased the suit land from said Laxmidhar ... Sale Deed executed by late
Natabara Samantaray in favour of pro forma defendant, plaintiff is entitled to temporary
injunction restraining the defendant no.1 from
Procedure (hereinafter to
be referred as `the Code') filed by petitioner-plaintiff no.2 was set aside.
I have heard learned counsel ... decision of present revision petition are
that present petitioner-plaintiff no.2 alongwith pro forma respondent no.2-
plaintiff no.1 filed suit for permanent
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Talwandi Sabo, vide
which evidence of the petitioners-plaintiffs has been closed by order.
I have heard learned counsel ... decision of present revision petition are
that petitioners-plaintiffs alongwith pro forma respondents no.5 to 8 filed a
suit for declaration that they
that the suit for declaration was filed by present petitioner-plaintiff
alongwith pro forma respondents-plaintiffs on the ground that that they have
become owners
List of employees as on 31.7.2006 alongwith coverage pro
forma was provided by respondent no.1-plaintiff himself to the concerned
Officer of petitioner. Respondent
