Mohd.Rashid And Others vs Dy.Chief Settlement Commissioner on 10 October, 2025
Mohd.Rashid And Others vs Dy.Chief Settlement Commissioner on 10 October, 2025
Author: Irshad
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 156 (0.69 seconds)Mohd.Rashid And Others vs Dy.Chief Settlement Commissioner on 10 October, 2025
Mohd.Rashid And Others vs Dy.Chief Settlement Commissioner on 10 October, 2025
Author: Irshad
Arun Kumar Sen vs Mukti Prakash Thakur on 19 August, 2025
with Order XXIII Rule 1A of the CPC , has been
dismissed.
2. Plaintiffs/opposite parties no.1 to 4 instituted Title Suit ... suit properties.
b. A decree for declaration that the plaintiff pro forma Defendant
only are successors of the aforesaid couple (Sanatan Sen) his
widow
Abhishek Singh vs Samarjeet Singh on 25 February, 2025
pro forma defendant was also
advancing the defendant a loan of Rs. 2,00,000/- and considering his
relation with the pro forma defendant ... pro forma defendant, which is within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. Summons of the suit were sent to the defendants and the pro forma
Arvinder Singh Puri vs Ashmeet Sahni Proprietor Of M/S. Shashi ... on 14 February, 2025
plaintiff as agreed. It
was denied that in accordance with pro-forma invoice the plaintiff has
procured the goods. It was denied that generally ... plaintiff firm has deposed to the effect that after defendant has
agreed to purchase fabric/material from the plaintiff, plaintiff has raised pro-
forma invoice
M/S Techno Expo vs M/S Udya Brothers Represented Through ... on 9 April, 2025
Plaintiff. In the
present case, it has been alleged by the Plaintiff that the Principal
Defendant had received money from pro-forma defendant ... under pressure and
misrepresentation by Plaintiff and the Plaintiff was requested not to
be in contact with pro-forma defendant in relation to the work
Asis Mukherjee & Anr vs Krishna Mitra & Anr on 8 January, 2025
permanent
injunction and that the declaration of ownership
of the plaintiffs and pro-forma defendant in equal
shares is the main declarative relief ... Late Saroj Kumar
Mazumdar on 5th May, 2001 and the plaintiffs
and the Pro-Forma defendant has again become
"owners in equal undivided shares
Yakub Etc vs Suleman Etc on 19 November, 2025
gravely erred in
holding that respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs and pro forma defendants No.6 to
27 had become owners of the suit
Birdevinder Singh vs Parminder Kaur And Ors on 3 February, 2025
below whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent
No.1, seeking a decree declaring the plaintiff and defendant No.4 to be
owners ... defendant
No.1; contesting respondent No.1 as the 'plaintiff' and pro forma
respondents No.2 to 4 as the 'defendants
Smt. Asima Das (Pan) & Ors vs Smt. Abharani Bhattacharyaa & Ors on 31 July, 2025
defendants/Opposite Parties namely Shanti Bhattacharya against the present
plaintiffs and also against pro forma defendant no.6 which was subsequently
numbered as Title suit ... title suit
No.116 of 1981 against the present plaintiffs and pro forma defendant No.6,
renumbered