Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Rohtak on 06.11.1996. Later on the Addl. District Judge, Rohtak has granted probate of will u/s 276 of the Indian Succession

whose will  the   Court   of   the   Additional   District   Judge   Chandigarh   had   granted   a  probate in 2002. 4. CPIO, through his reply dated 18.01.2010, informed appellant ... account of his sisters.  It was an account  based upon a probate granted by an appropriate court, whose order was  in   rem.     Apart   from

same viz. Probate petition no.853/2003 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Mumbai.  Said probate was granted on 18/5/2004. Shortly ... insurance claim in favour of the complainants, on the basis of probate which was obtained by the complainant on the basis of Will of late

same viz. Probate petition no.853/2003 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Mumbai.  Said probate was granted on 18/5/2004. Shortly ... insurance claim in favour of the complainants, on the basis of probate which was obtained by the complainant on the basis of Will of late

Officer in District Court Ghaziabad to act as District Delegates to grant probate & letters of administration under section 265 of Indian Succession ... then date of such appointment. b) How many Probate & Letter of Administration had been granted by District Judge & Additional District Judge of Ghaziabad

plot in favour of the complainant and directed him to get the probate/later of administration from the Civil Court, because it involves the civil ... name. Hence, the District Forum has accepted the complaint and granted the following relief to the complainant:- We hereby allow the present complaint with direction

S.K.Jain L/H Late Smt. Nemshri Jain, ... vs Assessee on 13 April, 2010

Amarjit Singh Puri, New Delhi vs Assessee on 29 September, 2010 IN THE INCOME TAX

Mr.Vir Bhan Sharma vs Cidco Ltd on 23 February, 2010 CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMM