Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.61 seconds)

K.Harigovindan vs The Chairman on 24 July, 2007

respondent, the petitioner did not prefer any appeal against the extension of probation before any statutory authority as contemplated under Regulation 8(2). Finally ... extension itself was illegal. With reference to this contention, it must be stated that there was no challenge to the extensions of probation given
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document
1   2 3 Next