relevant law and acting reasonably could have reached it, and (iii) procedural impropriety.
53. In Union of India v. G. Ganayutham the Supreme Court reiterated ... find out if the decision was illegal or suffered from procedural improprieties or was one which no sensible decision-maker could, on the material before
control by judicial review under three grounds namely, illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety. ( Tata Cellular v. Union of India , .)
34. Illegality, as a ground ... principles of natural justice and contrary to procedural fairness, such a decision suffers from 'procedural impropriety', which is the third ground for judicial
administrator's decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural impropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense ... administrator's decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural impropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the Court, in the sense
find out if the decision was illegal or suffered from procedural improprieties or was one which no sensible decision-maker could, on the material before ... administrator's decision unless it was illegal or suffered from procedural impropriety or was irrational - in the sense that it was in outrageous defiance
decision making process and
there was no illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety in the action
of the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes and therefore, issuance ... matter we do not see any illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety in
the action of the Commissioner".
From the said extracted portion
dated 13.04.2016, on grounds of illegality and
procedural impropriety. The parties in these appeals shall,
hereinafter, be referred to as they are arrayed ... respondent was
vitiated both on grounds of illegality as well as procedural
impropriety. The Learned Single Judge held that the appointment
of the 4th respondent
must give effect to it
(ii) Irrationality, namely, Wednesbury unreasonableness.
(iii) Procedural impropriety.
The above are only the broad grounds but it does not rule
illegality', the second 'irrationality' and the third
'procedural impropriety'.
By 'illegality' as a ground for judicial review ... judicial system....
I have described the third head as 'procedural impropriety' rather than
failure to observe basic rules of natural justice or failure
summarized in 1985 by Lord Diplock in CCSU case as illegality,
procedural impropriety and irrationality. He said more grounds could in
future become available, including ... illegality', the second 'irrationality' and the third 'procedural
impropriety'. That is not to say that further development on a case
find out if the decision was illegal or suffered from procedural improprieties or was one which no sensible decision-maker could, on the material before ... administrator's decision unless it was illegal or suffered from procedural impropriety or was irrational in the sense that it was in outrageous defiance
