Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Counsel on the same point of submission regarding illegality and impropriety of the procedure relied on a decision reported

private complaint under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 10. The learned Magistrate, of course, is bound to rely upon the complaint ... Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure at the appropriate stage. There is no illegality or impropriety in the finding rendered by the learned

regarding recall of the process issued Under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. It is observed in para No. 16 of the report ... stage is not by invoking Section 203 of the Code, because Criminal Procedure Code does not contemplate review of the order. Hence in the absence

complainant it has got power under Section 495 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (old Code) to authorise conduct of prosecution by any person ... fellow the third of the three options available, there is no impropriety or illegality, In Balasaheb K. Thackeray v. Venkat

before the application is made. When an application under Section 321 , Criminal Procedure Code is made, it is not necessary for the Court to assess ... acquittal or conviction, would be to rewrite Section 321 , Criminal Procedure Code and would be to concede to the Court a power which the scheme

possession of the complainant. When questioned under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C., the accused did not put forth any specific defence. In view ... which stood in favour of the complainant. There is no illegality or impropriety in any of the findings in the impugned judgment. 5. The learned

Manzoor Ahmed Wani vs State Of J And K on 22 March, 2006 Equivalent citations

Apurba Ballav Goswami vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 5 September, 2006 Equivalent citations

B.N. Singh vs Dcm Shriram Indus. Ltd. on 4 September, 2006 Equivalent citations: RLW2007

Mohd. Idris vs State on 6 November, 2006 Equivalent citations: RLW2007(2)RAJ913 JUDGMENT Harbans