Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Cbi vs . Rajinder Singh Rana Etc. on 18 July, 2016 IN THE COURT OF MS

following propositions: 16.1. Section 482 preserves the inherent powers of the High Court to prevent an abuse of the process of any court ... justice. The provision does not confer new powers. It only recognise and preserves powers which inhere in the High Court. 16.2. The invocation

preserves the inherent power of the High Court to make such Orders as it deems fit to prevent abuse of the process of the Court

such a case an order of the Court taking cognizance or issuing processes is an interlocutory order, does it stand to reason to say that ... that the bar will not operate to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court and/or to secure, the ends of justice

Vinod Kumar Chauhan vs State Thr. Cbi & Ors. on 21 December, 2016 Author: Vipin

Smt. Kanchana.L.Rao vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 February, 2016 Equivalent citations

S.Senguttuvan vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Police on 14 December, 2016 Author: S

Nityanand Pandey vs Revenue Department on 2 December, 2016 WP-7121-2016 (NITYANAND PANDEY Vs

Sri A.X.Edwin S/O Late A.M.Xavier, Aged ... vs State Bank Of

order of compulsory retirement which is not a punishment and preserves the right to pension. It is well settled that an order of compulsory retirement ... malice in law or fact have been imputed in the decision making process. Court is not the best judge of the needs and requirements