petitioner challenges the order
dated 19th January, 2016 declaring him a proclaimed offender.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even on the
allegations ... application before the learned ASJ. Proceedings for declaring the petitioner
as proclaimed offender were taken in a haste after anticipatory bail was
granted to Nitin
earlier trial
where the appellant was neither tried nor declared a proclaimed offender,
thus not meeting the pre-requisites of Section ... satisfied in the present case as the
appellant had been declared proclaimed offender by the learned Trial Court
vide order dated 16th October, 2008. Furthermore
order dated 21 st February, 2017 the two
petitioners were declared proclaimed offenders in case FIR No.600/2016
registered under Sections ... declare the petitioner Kailash Agarwal and Subhash Agarwal as proclaimed
offender. The facts noted in the application of the investigating officer dated
21st February
issued and finally, the appellant/accused was declared
proclaimed offender vide order 21.02.2002 passed by the Ld. M.M., Patiala
House Courts, New Delhi ... investigation, charge sheet
against the appellant/accused was filed as proclaimed offender.
2.3. Later, on 01.09.2015, the absconding appellant/accused was
apprehended and arrested vide
petitioner contends that the petitioner was
wrongly declared as a proclaimed offender despite the fact that he was
continuously attending to his activities ... State opposing the bail contends that the
petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender on 2nd July, 2010 and despite
the FIR having been registered
been
initiated against her and the consequent proceedings for declaring
proclaimed offender is pending before the Trial Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends ... proceedings pending actually and the petitioner
was illegally declared a proclaimed offender. A perusal of the paper
book filed by the petitioner and the status
woman aged between 35-40 years
named Sapna (declared 'Proclaimed Offender') at Gaudiya Railway Station.
She became friends with her and used ... told her
that she has a brother named Sagar (declared 'Proclaimed Offender') to
CRL.A. 912/2016 Page 3 of 13
whom
Nauty, Chander
Prakash @ Pappu, Ranjit @ Rahul and Nagender @ Vicky were declared
proclaimed offenders on 24th August, 2011. However, accused Chander
Prakash @ Pappu and Vijay @ Nauty ... Chander Prakash @ Pappu, both of whom were initially
declared as proclaimed offenders and were arrested on 22 nd May, 2013, that
is, after almost
Appellant
Amit could not be arrested despite efforts and was declared
proclaimed offender (PO). Later, the IO also filed supplementary
charge sheet against appellant Amit ... learned APP that the
appellant Amit Kumar had been declared proclaimed offender in this
regard.
The learned APP inter alia relied upon Nizamuddin v. State
respondent No.2 and in 9 FIRs they have been declared proclaimed
offenders. Their whereabouts are not known. In the present FIR also they
were ... declared a proclaimed offender where after with great difficulty the
respondent No.2 and his son were arrested.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent
