would not be permissible.
CLARIFICATION OF DISTINCTION IN "PROCLAIMED PERSON"
AND PROCLAIMED OFFENDER":
Learned counsel for the petitioner-Mr. Tanvir Ahmed ... that
nomenclature of a person to be 'proclaimed person' or a 'proclaimed
offender' will not diminish the rigour of Section
declared a "proclaimed person" and not a "proclaimed offender". He has
Crl. Misc. No.M-24202 of 2011 5
..
also cited ... aforesaid two categories by giving them the names
"proclaimed persons" and "proclaimed offenders".
In these circumstances, although the impugned order declaring
vide judgment dated 29.10.2010 (Annexure P-2) and the
petitioners remained proclaimed offender during this time, the
impunged FIR was liable to be quashed ... learned counsel for the petitioners fairly
conceded that petitioners were declared proclaimed offender in the
year 2003, as stated in para 7 of the petition
proclaimed person. So, the order Annexure P-2 can be modified
to the extent that petitioner is the proclaimed person and not proclaimed
offender ... Parliament in its wisdom has provided different sentences
for proclaimed person and proclaimed offender. Under Section 174-A of
the IPC the punishment is severe
offender" includes the proclaimed person but the word "proclaimed person"
does not include the "proclaimed offender". Actually this difference ... than the offence committed by the "proclaimed
person" particularly for the reason that proclaimed offender is one who
fulfills the following condition
proclaimed person. So, the order Annexure P-4 can be modified
to the extent that petitioner is the proclaimed person and not proclaimed
offender ... Parliament in its wisdom has provided different sentences
for proclaimed person and proclaimed offender. Under Section 174-A of
the IPC the punishment is severe
accused
Manish Sharma absconded and on 31.8.2007 he was declared Proclaimed
Offender but on 7.4.2010 the accused Manish Sharma was arrested and the
trial ... Chaturvedi declared the accused Manish Sharma as
Proclaimed Offender and he tried to search the accused. He has further
deposed that on 07.04.2010 accused Manish
Sushil Kumar @ Sushi could not be arrested and he
was declared Proclaimed Offender vide by the Ld. MM on 6.7.2009.
St. Vs. Mukesh @ Bhola ... after the arrest of accused Sushil who was earlier Proclaimed
Offender and the witness has corroborated his earlier testimony in toto.
(13) PW3 Mohd. Ismail
Accused Hans Raj @ Raj Has Been Charge vs Kamraj (Proclaimed Offender) Was ... on 19 May, 2012
-1-
IN THE COURT OF MS. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA ... towards Siri Fort Road. Two accused viz. Hans Raj and Ashok
(Proclaimed Offender) were sitting at the front seat of the car
while accused
State vs Kurian Thomas ..(Proclaimed Offender) on 24 August, 2012
IN THE COURT OF SH. VIRENDER KUMAR GOYAL
ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE: FAST TRACK COURT
ROHINI ... Unique Identification No. 02404R1002282003
State
Versus
1. Kurian Thomas ..(Proclaimed offender)
Son of Mathai Thomas
R/o C269, Tagore Garden, Delhi
