purpose of production of documents. Neither the documents
produced nor any steps have been taken to have the documents
procured.
6. In the light
purpose of production of documents. Neither the documents
produced nor any steps have been taken to have the documents
procured.
6. In the light
they
have no evidence to adduce. Subsequently, the 15th defendant
produced certain documents in favour of other defendants. The
petitioner would say that there ... written statement. It is therefore stated that the documents
produced are procured through unlawful means. It is stated that
O.P.(C) No.3071/2014
property
W.P.C. No. 16156 of 2015
-7-
as per document No.4814/2005 which is produced ... area and therefore Ext.P5 is
improper and illegal. It was procured by the petitioner as a
counter blast to the proceedings initiated
plaintiff
that on a day between 20.2.1998 and 6.3.1998 he procured a
photostat copy of the agreement. This court repeatedly asked
the learned counsel ... 2006.
11
There was no definite answer. It so happened that he
procured it only on a day between 20.2.1998 and 6.3.1998
even though
Sreekala was executed in 1998 and there is no challenge to that
document. Apart from the above fact, it needs to be noticed that ... evidence in support of the Will so also
the scribe and the document writer. It is not as if there was no
attempt from
2011.
5
(AIR 1963 SC 1633) and contended that being a public
document, it is admissible in evidence and no further
evidence is required ... prosecutrix.
The School Leaving Certificate produced by the
prosecution was also procured on 12.9.1996, six days
after the incident and three days after the arrest
fraud, the term "intrinsic usually
means that fraud was practiced in procuring the
transaction, as distinguished from extrinsic fraud, which
means that fraud ... subject matter of O.S.475 of 1998 is a
forged document and it is null and void. A false
claim
Vijitha.V. Kumar vs Kalappurayil Santhi on 21 January, 2014
Author: P.Bhavadasan
Bench: P